top of page
Acr46972564224-2473497.jpg

SOUTH CAROLINA

ENERGY
PROGRESS UPDATE

colorAsset 1_4x.png

An inside look at South Carolina's energy decision-making and the critical role the
Public Service Commission and Legislature play in keeping monopoly utilities in check.  

2024

Mixed results on power company long-term plans and careful consideration goes to rate hike proposals. 

Santee Cooper plans approved with little pushback. The PSC ignored public input on Santee Cooper’s long-term plans and failed to hold power companies accountable on coal plant retirement delays, restrictions on clean energy, and major fossil fuel buildouts [1].

​

Statewide rate hike settlements. The PSC held multiple public hearings on rate hikes from Duke Energy Carolinas [2] and Dominion Energy [3]. It also scrutinized rate hike plans and approved settlement agreements that improved power company programs and lowered authorized profits [4]. 

 

Duke Energy long-term plans. The PSC approved a long-term plan for Duke Energy that avoided major delays in coal plant retirements, added meaningful amounts of renewable energy, and required recommendations from environmental groups on energy efficiency, transmission, and customer-sited generation [5]. 

2017

2018

2019

2021

Sources

Now

This website is for informational purposes only and the materials contained herein are not construed to be legal advice. No duty is being created or undertaken by UPowerSC, Conservation Voters of South Carolina Education Fund, or any affiliated entities.

bottom of page